Photo manipulations and ethics

A) some of the main points i read in the article are editing pictures with photoshop with changing how people look, and how different manipulations are different from back then to now.
B) They believe in not changing the photos and leaving it the way it is
C) I think to edit the photo to enhance it but i don't think peoples bodies and such should be photo shopped to look differently.


  

I think this was very unethical because Times changed the photo to make him appear a darker shade than he is and made him look menacing. I think this is wrong because why make someone appear different than how they actually are, if other magazines are posting the actual version of the photograph its obvious that times altered the photo.

     I find this the least unethical because yes its bad that they photoshopped her face its not as bad as the other ones. Now a days they photoshop everyone in magazines so its typical now a days.